Review: PhantomCam X — Best Thermal Camera for Ghost Hunts?
We tested the PhantomCam X across field hunts and cold-case stakeouts. Here's how it performed for live investigators and streamers.
Review: PhantomCam X — Best Thermal Camera for Ghost Hunts?
Thermal cameras have become a common tool in paranormal investigations thanks to their ability to reveal heat differences invisible to the naked eye. The PhantomCam X is one of the most hyped devices on the market. We field-tested it across five live investigations to assess image quality, stream integration, battery life, and whether it adds measurable value for live evidence gathering.
What we tested
Testing protocol included:
- Nighttime urban stakeout (nocturnal heat signatures)
- Cold-structure interior sweep (static comparison)
- Mobile tracking during on-foot reconnaissance
- Long-duration overnight deployment (12+ hours)
- Live stream integration with Slimer.live via OBS
First impressions and build
The PhantomCam X ships in a compact, weather-resistant housing and feels robust. The 320x240 radiometric sensor is a mid-tier spec; it isn't the highest resolution sensor available, but it balances price, power, and data output well. The device includes a small OLED menu and physical controls that are usable with gloves — a practical touch for fieldwork.
Image quality and sensitivity
In field tests the PhantomCam X delivered clean, interpretable images in ambient temperatures. Heat differentials were visible across 0.5°C changes in controlled indoor conditions, and outdoors the camera detected localized warm spots around machinery and animals easily. However, thermal is not a silver bullet. It can't confirm sentience or intention — only temperature variance.
Stream integration
The PhantomCam X supports USB video class output and an RTSP fallback, which makes it compatible with most streaming setups. We connected it to OBS and Slimer.live to test multi-feed switching. The camera performed reliably with minimal latency. The RTSP stream sometimes introduced compression artifacts under low-bandwidth cellular conditions — work around by using a hardware encoder if available.
Battery life and durability
Battery life depends on recording settings and whether you're streaming continuously. Expect 4–6 hours of continuous use under moderate settings; carrying spare battery packs or using an external power bank is recommended for overnight operations. The camera survived a light downpour during one test, but heavy rain requires additional protection.
Pros and cons
- Pros: Compact and rugged, good sensitivity for the price, easy streaming integration, usable controls for fieldwork.
- Cons: Mid-tier resolution, limited battery life for all-night runs, artifacts on low-bandwidth RTSP streams.
When to use a PhantomCam X
The PhantomCam X is an excellent mid-range option for teams who want thermal capability without going into six-figure gear budgets. It's well-suited for:
- Supplemental perimeter sweeps
- On-camera contrast for atmospheric streams
- Real-time telemetry overlays during live streams
It is less suited for forensic-grade thermal reconstruction where the highest resolution and radiometric precision matter.
Final verdict
For live paranormal creators and small-to-medium investigative teams, the PhantomCam X hits a strong value point. It is not the definitive thermal camera for every scenario, but it is the best mid-tier balance we've seen in 2025–2026. We recommend pairing it with a dedicated battery solution and a hardware encoder for extended live streaming sessions.
Score
Rating: 8.0 / 10
"The PhantomCam X turned ambiguous night shapes into interviewable data points — without breaking the bank."
Recommended for streamers who want reliable thermal imaging and native streaming compatibility at a reasonable price.
Related Topics
Mara Voss
Editor-in-Chief
Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.
Up Next
More stories handpicked for you